Loading

Executive Summary

Minister's Executive Summary - Budget 2010
4   |   MINISTER’S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
Lifting the Long-term Performance of the Economy 
New Zealand’s economic growth rate in recent years has been poor.  Our economy had 
already slowed noticeably prior to the global shock impacting (Figure 1).   
Getting back to strong growth is the 
only way to deliver the incomes and 
opportunities that New Zealanders 
aspire to. 
Through the mid-2000s, a range of 
factors acted to constrain growth.  An 
overheated domestic economy, fuelled 
by increasing government expenditure, 
gradually increased pressure on 
available resources and resulted in 
persistently high inflation in the non-
tradable sector.  Monetary policy 
tightened during this period, with 
higher interest rates encouraging the 
New Zealand dollar to appreciate. 
Domestic demand was partially funded from high rates of borrowing, with household and 
agriculture debt rising sharply over much of the 2000s.  This rise was more than matched 
by increasing house and farm prices, so that net wealth increased.  However, house and 
farm prices rose well above fundamental determinants, such as income and farm returns.   
A fall in national saving, led by households, contributed to a rise in the current account 
deficit to 8% of GDP on average from 2004 to 2008, before it fell during the recession.  
The savings of foreigners were increasingly used to finance these deficits, so that our net 
external debt position grew to $168 billion, over 90% of GDP. 
Growth in the previous decade was unbalanced 
As well as growth being weak, the 
years leading up to recession featured 
a divergence between different 
sectors.  Output from exporters and 
those that directly compete with 
imports, often termed the tradable part 
of the economy, has not grown since 
2005 and is currently around 2002 
levels.  This includes sectors such as 
agriculture, horticulture, mining and 
resources, forestry, fishing, food 
manufacturing and tourism, all areas 
where New Zealand should be 
benefiting from its natural advantages. 
In contrast, non-tradable industries such as construction, retail and government 
administration grew strongly.  This divergence was a drag on productivity growth. 
Figure 1 – Trend growth  
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
Quarterly
Actual real GDP growth
Trend growth
1959-75: 4%pa
1975-90: 1.2%pa
1990-2006: 3%pa
2006-14: 1.9%pa
Annual average  % change
Sources: Hall and McDermott (2009), Statistics 
New Zealand, The Treasury 
Figure 2 – Tradables and non-tradables output 
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 
Real GDP  Index
(Mar 1995 = 100)
Tradable sector
Non-tradable sector
Source: The Treasury 
B10-execsumm-5